Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2009/07/21 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I would gratefully ask that line 24 of DD Form 214 be changed to honorable discharge and line 28 be changed to medical or service connected disability. I was discharged for failure to meet physical standards. I constantly had problems completing runs. I was not overweight or a problem soldier. After my discharge my V.A. representative sent me to get a evaluation for a service connected disability. It was determined that i was awarded a 30 percent disability. I believe that a large part of my service connected disability relates directly with my ability to run. As of today i still suffer from arthritis in my knee and ankles. I am confident that my service while enlisted could not be called anything but honorable." II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 010921 Discharge Received: Date: 011212 Chapter: 13-2e AR: 635-200 Reason: Physical Standards RE: SPD: LFT Unit/Location: B Co, 1/327th Inf Regt, 101st Abn Div (AASLT), Fort Campbell, KY Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 19 Current ENL Date: 980619 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03Mos, 25Days ????? Total Service: 03 Yrs, 03Mos, 25Days ????? Previous Discharges: None Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 11B10/Infantryman GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None Decorations/Awards: ASR V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: Heath, OH Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 September 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for numerous Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failures and because it was determined the applicant would not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further training and/or become a satisfactory Soldier, with a honorable discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 21 September 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 24 September 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13-2e of this regulation, states in pertinent part, that separation proceedings will be initiated for Soldiers without medical limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test. The reason for discharge will be shown as physical standards. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review, the documents, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to fully honorable. The analyst noted that the applicant was discharged for the sole reason of a failure to meet the minimum standards of the Army Physical Fitness Test and that the unit commander recommended an honorable characterization of service. The analyst also noted the lack of any other derogatory information in the record. In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. The applicant contends that a large part of his service connected disability relates directly with his ability to run. The analyst acknowledges the independent document (Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision) submitted with the application awarding the applicant a overall or combined rating of 30% for his chronic right ankle sprain, degenerative changes to right knee, cervical strain, and lumbar strain. However, the applicant's available record does not contain any evidence of inservice diagnosis of chronic right ankle sprain, degenerative changes to right knee, cervical strain, and lumbar strain as indicated in the independent documentation from the Department of Veteran Affairs. The applicant did not submit any corroborating evidence of inservice diagnosis of chronic right ankle sprain, degenerative changes to right knee, cervical strain, and lumbar strain or related medical issues. Furthermore, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, Paragraph 13-2e, AR 635-200. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Physical Standards," and the separation code is "LFT." Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes. The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized. There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation. Therefore, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 2 June 2010 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision dated 11 June 2002. VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as result it is inequitable. The Board found that the length of the applicant's service and the circumstances surrounding the discharge, mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. IX. Board Decision XI. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 5 No change 0 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20090012968 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages