IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021435 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his general discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge with a more favorable narrative reason for separation. 2. The applicant states he was informed that he would have to wait 6 months to a year to have his discharge upgraded. 3. The applicant provides a one-page statement explaining his application and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 August 1999 for a period of 3 years. He completed training as a petroleum supply specialist and he was assigned to Fort Stewart, Georgia for his first and only assignment. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 14 January 2002. 2. On 19 May 2002, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years and a selective reenlistment bonus. 3. On 23 December 2002, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c for misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense). He cited as the basis for his recommendation that the applicant had two violations of driving under the influence of alcohol, three violations of failure to report, and failure to obey a lawful order. 4. After consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his rights and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf. 5. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be furnished a general discharge. 6. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 21 January 2003 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-13c, for misconduct. He had served 3 years, 5 months, and 18 days of active service. 7. A review of the available evidence shows that nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant on at least three occasions for multiple failures to go to his appointed place of duty, dereliction of duty, and assault. 8. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. On 6 March 2013, the ADRB determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny his request for an upgrade of his discharge. 9. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. Chapter 14 establishes policy and procedures for separating personnel for misconduct. Specific categories include minor infractions, a pattern of misconduct, involvement in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities, and commission of a serious offense, which includes drug offenses. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. b. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would jeopardize his rights. 2. Accordingly, the characterization and the narrative reason for separation were appropriate for the circumstances of his case. The applicant's overall service simply did not rise to the level of a fully honorable discharge. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____ X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140021435 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140021435 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1