IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 October 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015741 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. 2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. 3. The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. 2. The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process. 3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy. 4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination. 2. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses; Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable; and whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD section 4.130 was made. 3. The SRP considered the criteria for diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders Fourth Edition Text Revision including: the evidence for the stressor (criterion A), re-experiencing of the event (criterion B), persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma (criterion C), hyperarousal (criterion D), duration and onset (criterion E), and presence of clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important area of functioning (criterion F). The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) forwarded adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood to the PEB for adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the applicant for the diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry and determined that it was not an unfitting condition as it did not constitute a physical disability. The SRP determined that the MH diagnosis was not changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 4. The SRP later considered if the diagnosis was appropriate. The applicant was already engaged with MH for marital issues prior to the 3 December 2008 seizure which led to evacuation from the theater. The diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) was given later based on symptoms which the applicant attributed to the “new onset” seizure disorder and attendant symptoms. However, there was insufficient evidence that the applicant met the full diagnostic criteria for MDD. The SRP also considered if an unfitting MH condition, regardless of diagnosis, was present at time of the applicant's separation. The MEB determined that the condition met retention standards. 5. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the evidence does not support the presence of an unfitting MH condition at TDRL entry regardless of diagnosis and, therefore, no additional disability rating can be assigned. 6. The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x___ ____x___ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140015741 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1