IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130006200 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of her request to upgrade her discharge. 2. The applicant states: * the prior Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision is incorrect as to her military occupational specialty (MOS) and her duty assignments * her treatment after 15 years of service, a 14-month deployment, and the death of her husband is unjust * she did nothing wrong and has never threatened anyone * she sat in jail for 3 months waiting for a court-martial that never occurred * she never signed a summary court-martial or admitted guilt to all of the charges * she admits to having been late to formation on three occasions 3. The applicant provides an 11-page rebuttal letter and a copy of the prior ABCMR Record of Proceedings with its supporting documentation. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20120005779 on 4 September 2012. 2. On 1 December 1997, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army with prior Army National Guard and Army Reserve service. She reenlisted on 7 August 2003 and 30 December 2008. 3. Her Enlisted Record Brief shows her assignments as: * MOS 71L (Administrative Specialist) from 11 December 1997 through 4 September 2003 * MOS 42L (Mail Delivery Clerk) from 5 September 2003 through 26 May 2004 * MOS 88M (Motor Transport Operator) 27 May 2004 through her date of discharge 4. On 2 November 2009, her unit commander notified her that he was considering imposing nonjudicial punishment (NJP) against her under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for failing to go to her appointed place of duty on two separate occasions; showing contempt toward her first sergeant by disregarding his commands by continuing to walk down the hall, out of the building then driving away in her car; willfully disobeying a lawful order from her first sergeant; and making a false official statement. She declined NJP and demanded a trial by a court-martial. 5. The applicant was placed in pretrial confinement from 9 December 2009 through 25 March 2010. 6. On 3 March 2010, she submitted an offer to plead guilty wherein she agreed to plead guilty to one specification of one charge in exchange for being tried by a summary court-martial. The applicant submits copies of her counsel's appendix and page 1 of her plea offer. The copy of the offer in her official military records bears her signature on page 2. 7. Her command denied her plea offer and placed her in pretrial confinement pending trial by a special court-martial on all charges and specifications. 8. On 17 March 2010 after consulting with counsel, the applicant signed a request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. She stated: I, SGT D____ A. L____, hereby voluntarily request discharge in lieu of trial by Court-Martial under AR [Army Regulation] 635-200, Chapter 10. I understand that I may request discharge in lieu of trial by Court-Martial because of the following charges which have been preferred against me under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which authorize the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge: * Violation of Article 107, UCMJ, One Specification * Violation of Article 92, UCMJ, One Specification * Violation of Article 91, UCMJ, Two Specifications * Violation of Article 86, UCMJ, Four Specifications I am making this request of my own free will and have not been subjected to any coercion whatsoever by any person. I have been advised of the implications that are attached to it. By submitting this request for discharge, I acknowledge that I understand the elements of the offenses with which I am charged and am guilty of it or of a lesser-included offense(s) therein contained which also authorize(s) the imposition of a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge. 9. Her chain of command approved the discharge request under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed the issuance of a general discharge. 10. On 7 April 2010, the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. She completed 13 years, 11 months, and 15 days of total active service and 11 years, 7 months, and 14 days of inactive service. She accrued 109 days of lost time. 11. On 1 February 2012, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of her discharge. 12. On 4 September 2012, the ABCMR denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of her discharge. 13. In her request for reconsideration the applicant provides an accounting of her military work history from the date of her first enlistment in the Regular Army. She states she is a professional social worker with a doctorate degree. She states she has a "toxic" family situation but that situation has nothing to do with her military career. She asks why she would risk it all by being unprofessional after working for over 15 years. She was never charged with misconduct and never signed paperwork related to a summary court-martial. Even after she paid over $800.00 to counsel, she never had a summary court-martial and any documentation about one was signed only by her counsel. She has never threatened or disrespected any officer or noncommissioned officer. Also while she was in confinement, all of her furniture, clothes, and military equipment were stolen from her off-base housing. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The incomplete listing of the history of the applicant's MOS's and duty assignments is not in error and has no bearing on the misconduct that resulted in her discharge. 2. The applicant did, in fact, sign a request for a summary court-martial as a part of her offer to plead guilty. This request was rejected by her command which resulted in her confinement pending a special court-martial. The applicant submits only page 1 of the agreement followed by the counsel appendix, which bears only his signature, but not page 2 of the offer that would bear her signature. 3. In the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, she acknowledged the offenses and that she was guilty of those offenses or of lesser-included offenses. This statement is an admission of guilt. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20120005779, dated 4 September 2012. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130006200 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130006200 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1