IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 May 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120019874 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). 2. The applicant states he did not receive the BSM and CIB. 3. The applicant provides a WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's military records are not available for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. 3. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the following: * he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 March 1943 * his Arm or Service as Corps of Engineers * his military occupational specialty is shown as "Rigger 189" * he served in the European Theater of Operations from 30 January 1944 through 22 February 1945 * he was honorably discharged on 13 October 1945 after he completed 2 years, 6 months, and 29 days of active military service 4. Item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he participated in the Normandy, Northern France, and Rhineland campaigns. 5. Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the Purple Heart, European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1). 6. There are no orders available awarding the applicant the BSM or CIB. 7. War Department Circular 269-1943 established the CIB and the Expert Infantryman Badge to recognize and provide an incentive to infantrymen. The CIB was awarded for exemplary conduct in action against the enemy. War Department Circular 186-1944 further provided that the CIB was to be awarded only to infantrymen serving with infantry units of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. Additionally, World War II (WWII) holders of the CIB received a monthly pay supplement known as combat infantry pay. Therefore, Soldiers had economic as well as intangible reasons to ensure that their records were correct. Thus, pay records are frequently the best available source to verify entitlement to this award. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the BSM is awarded for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service in military operations against an armed enemy. The BSM is authorized for each individual who was cited in orders or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat between 7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945 or whose achievement or service during that period was confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July 1947. An award of the CIB or the Combat Medical Badge is considered to be a citation in orders. Therefore, the BSM is to be awarded to individuals who were authorized either badge for service during WWII. 9. Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion. Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award. 10. The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN: AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award. A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638. Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents. Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request. The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. There is no evidence available nor did the applicant submit any evidence showing he held an infantry MOS, received combat infantry pay, engaged in active ground combat, or that he was assigned to an infantry unit. Regrettably, the evidence is not sufficient upon which to base award of the CIB. 2. Further, there is also no evidence available nor did the applicant provide any evidence that shows he is entitled to award of the BSM. In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis upon which to grant award of the BSM. 3. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant a BSM, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the BSM by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10 USC 1130. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X____ __X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019874 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019874 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1