BOARD DATE: 15 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011602 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). 2. The applicant states he was assigned to the 128th Assault Helicopter Company in Vietnam. During this assignment he served as an aircraft commander of an aircraft with tail number UH-1H 69-15270. While on a mission, his aircraft took intense enemy fire resulting in casualties. The radios were lost and the aircraft was losing massive amounts of oil from the engine and transmission fluid. Despite the loss of the radios and the damage to the aircraft they managed to fly to the nearest evacuation hospital. As a result of this action he was nominated for award of the DFC in July 1971. Additionally, his company commander informed him he would receive this award before he returned to the United States. 3. The applicant provides a copy of a web page, dated 6 June 2012. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. After having had previous enlisted service the applicant was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve Commissioned officer on 15 August 1968 and entered active duty. He held military occupational specialty 1981 (Rotary Wing Aviation Unit Commander). 3. His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he was assigned in Vietnam from 29 July 1970 to 29 July 1971 and he served with the 195th Aviation Company (Assault Helicopter) from 1 August to 10 November 1970. He served with the 128th Aviation Company (Assault Helicopter), 11th Aviation Battalion (Combat), Vietnam from 15 November 1970 to 24 July 1971. 4. His record contains no evidence of a recommendation or orders for the DFC. 5. He was honorably released from active duty on 20 August 1972. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 years and 6 days of net active service, 1 year and 1 day of which was credited as foreign service in Vietnam. This form and his DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) show he was awarded the: * Purple Heart * Air Medal with “V” Device with Numeral 36 * National Defense Service Medal * Army Aviator Badge * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Bronze Star Medal * 2 Overseas Service Bars 6. He provided a copy of a web page containing information regarding the aircraft on which he flew in Vietnam. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty. The extraordinary achievement must have resulted in an accomplishment so exceptional and outstanding as to clearly set the individual apart from his or her comrades or from other persons in similar circumstances. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Award of the DFC requires a formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders. The applicant has provided no evidence nor is there evidence in his record to show he was recommended for or received orders for award of the DFC. 2. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x__ ___x_____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011602 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011602 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1