IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011088 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending on 25 October 1951 to add the Silver Star. 2. The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he sustained in the Korean War. His platoon sergeant told him he had been recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal; however, the recommendation was pulled and resubmitted as a recommendation for the Silver Star. Soon after this he rotated out of his unit and was discharged. He never heard anything more about his award of the Silver Star. 3. The applicant provides no additional evidence. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 January 1949 and held military occupational specialty 1745 (Light Weapons Infantry Leader). 3. His record contains a The Adjutant General's Office (TAGO) Form 01254 (Transcript of Military Record), dated 3 March 1955. This form includes a list of awards and decorations he was awarded or authorized. The Silver Star was not listed on this form. 4. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not list the Silver Star. 5. His military records do not include a recommendation for or orders authorizing award of the Silver Star. 6. He was honorably discharged from active duty on 25 October 1951. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years and 9 months of net active service, of which 11 months and 20 days was credited as foreign service. The Silver Star was not listed on this form. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy. The required gallantry (spirited and conspicuous acts of heroism and courage) must have been performed with marked distinction. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. 8. Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion. Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award. 9. The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN: AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award. A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638. Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents. Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request. The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s record is void of any formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, or orders that show he was awarded the Silver Star. Furthermore, there is no documentary evidence in the available record and the applicant did not submit any substantiating evidence that shows the specific acts of heroism and courage against the enemy that he performed with marked distinction and led to meeting the criteria for award of the Silver Star. 2. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant a Silver Star, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the Silver Star by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130. 3. Based on the forgoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant relief in this case. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011088 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011088 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1