IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010209 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of his narrative reason for separation. 2. The applicant states he injured his right ankle in basic training. His left ankle is the one he sprained when he was 16 years old; therefore, he does not believe he entered military service fraudulently. 3. The applicant provides military medical records in support of his request. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 March 1997 and he was assigned to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, to attend basic combat training. 3. The applicant provides medical treatment records showing he received treatment for a right ankle sprain and knee problems in April and May 1997. 4. The applicant's record is void of the specific medical board documents related to his separation processing. It does contain a memorandum from his unit commander confirming he counseled the applicant regarding his options in regard to a Trainee Medical Retention Board and that the applicant elected separation. It contains a memorandum from the applicant's battalion commander recommending his separation. The record also contains a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that identifies the authority and reason for his discharge. 5. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 16 June 1997 by reason of "failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards" under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200(Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). It also shows he completed a total of 2 months and 21 days of active military service. 6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the authority for the separation of enlisted members from active duty. Paragraph 5-11 provides for the separation of personnel who do not meet procurement medical fitness standards. Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty for training may be separated. Such conditions must be discovered during the first 6 months of active duty. Such findings will result in an Entrance Physical Standards Board. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's request to change the narrative reason for his separation has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. 2. The applicant's record is void of Entrance Physical Standards Board proceedings. However, it does contain memoranda from his unit commander and battalion commander that confirm the applicant underwent processing by a Trainee Medical Retention Board and that he agreed to separation based on failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards. 3. The applicant's record also contains a DD Form 214 that confirms the authority and reason for his separation. Absent any evidence of error or injustice, there is a presumption of regularity attached to this document. The evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant are not sufficiently compelling to overcome the presumption of regularity attached to the DD Form 214. As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ______________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120010209 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120010209 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1