IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008869 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests to be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his eligible dependents. 2. The applicant states that had he known he could transfer a benefit he had earned during his 23 years, 3 months, and 24 days of service, he would have gladly done so. Due to a lack of funds, he was unable to attend college, so he desires to give his children something back for the support they provided him during the times he was deployed or working on weekends. He contends it is unfair that he is unable to do this because he was not informed about the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program through proper channels. He attests he did not know about the possibility of transferring his benefits to a family member until his son applied to attend a school and a staff member made him aware of the program. 3. The applicant provides no additional evidence. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. After completing sufficient service for retirement, on 30 April 2009, the applicant was honorably discharged from the South Dakota Army National Guard and transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank/grade of staff sergeant/E-6. 2. During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau, dated 7 August 2012, wherein he states: a. Public Law 110-252 establishes legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. b. The applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to his dependents because he was not a member of the service on or after 1 August 2009, which is a requirement established in law. 3. On 9 August 2012, the advisory opinion was furnished to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. He did not respond. 4. On 22 June 2009, Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or b. has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or c. is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. 5. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's contentions were carefully considered. However, since he retired prior to implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the program to his dependents by law. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x___ ____x___ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned should know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices he made in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120008869 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120008869 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1