IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001149 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). 2. The applicant states: * His records do not reflect he served in a combat zone or that he was a Vietnam veteran eligible for the CIB * He wasn't awarded the CIB * He was an Army enlisted Soldier and he served in the Vietnam War * He was assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 82nd Artillery * In Vietnam he did not perform in his assigned military occupational specialty (MOS) but fought in active ground combat against the enemy * He was in the direct line of fire as he fought alongside fellow Soldiers * He was dropped from a helicopter in the middle of nowhere and was caught in enemy crossfire 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 February 1969 for a period of 2 years. He completed his training and was awarded MOS 76A (supply clerk). He served in MOS 76A assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery (HHB), 3rd Battalion, 82nd Artillery in Vietnam. On 24 February 1971, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation. 3. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 February 1971 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. Item 30 (Remarks) of this DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 29 June 1970 to 24 February 1971. 4. There are no orders for the CIB in the available records. 5. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the CIB. 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. 7. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. This regulation stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the CIB was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service. Further, “the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.” This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry specialty/military occupational specialty and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. He contends he is eligible for the CIB because he did not perform in his assigned MOS in Vietnam but he fought in active ground combat against the enemy. However, there is no evidence and he provided no evidence to support this contention. 2. There are no orders for the CIB pertaining to the applicant. Evidence shows he served as a supply clerk assigned to HHB, 3rd Battalion, 82nd Artillery during his assignment in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which shows he was an infantryman who served in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the CIB in this case. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110001149 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110001149 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1