IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 JUNE 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100028937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Medical Badge. 2. The applicant states he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge while serving in Vietnam with Company B, 25th Medical Battalion, 25th Infantry Division and he would like to have it added to his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 October 1965. He completed initial entry training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 91A (medical corpsman). He was advanced to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and he was awarded MOS 91B (medical specialist). 3. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he performed duties as a medical corpsman in Vietnam while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 35th Infantry during the period 30 March 1966 through 21 March 1967. 4. He was honorably released from active duty on 11 October 1967 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation. He completed 2 years of total active service. 5. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 he does not show award of the Combat Medical Badge. 6. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Combat Medical Badge. 7. There are no orders in his records and the applicant did not provide any orders that show he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Medical Badge is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. There is no evidence the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Combat Medical Badge. 2. By regulation, in order to support award of the Combat Medical Badge, in addition to evidence that the medical personnel were assigned or attached to an authorized unit, the Soldier must have been personally present and have satisfactorily performed medical duties while the combat arms unit was engaged in active ground combat. There is no evidence in the available records and he did not provide any evidence to corroborate that he personally performed medical duties while assigned to an infantry unit while that unit was engaged in active ground combat. Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat. 3. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING __X_____ __X_____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028937 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028937 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1