IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100027021 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the following awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 14 February 1972: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation 2. The applicant states these awards were not included on his DD Form 214 when he left the Republic of Vietnam and the Army. 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 August 1969 * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 14 February 1972 * a letter, dated 13 September 2010, from the National Personnel Records Center * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * his separation physical examination given on 9 February 1972 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 August 1969. On 10 August 1969 he was discharged to immediately enlist in the Regular Army on 11 August 1969 in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 67N (UH-1 Helicopter Repairman). 3. He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 14 February to 28 December 1970. He was assigned to the 238th Aviation Company from 21 February to 26 December 1970. He was promoted to specialist five/pay grade E-5 on 18 December 1970. 4. There is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal. Records do not show indiscipline or lost time. His records do not contain any adverse information and his DA Form 20 shows he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service. 5. On 14 February 1972, he was released from active duty. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 indicates he was awarded or is authorized: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal * one overseas service bar * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 6. Based on the applicant's dates of service in Vietnam, Table B-1 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows he served in the: * Vietnam Winter - Spring 1970 Campaign (1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970) * DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive Campaign (1 May 1970 - 30 June 1970) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII Campaign (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971) 7. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, unit citation emblems awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. a. The 238th Aviation Company was not awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to that unit. b. All units assigned in Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, based on Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974. 8. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders. 9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 authorizes award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation. The regulation states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate campaign and service medal, which in this case is the Vietnam Service Medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's records do not show indiscipline or lost time, he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his military service, and he was promoted to specialist five in less than 2 years. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 5 August 1969 to 14 February 1972 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. 2. He participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, he is authorized three bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal. 3. He served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period all units assigned in the Republic of Vietnam were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. 4. There is no evidence the 238th Aviation Company was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Therefore, he is not authorized to have this award added to his DD Form 214. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ____X___ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 5 August 1969 to 14 February 1972; and b. adding the following to item 24 of his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 14 February 1972: * Army Good Conduct Medal * three bronze service stars to be added to his Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100027021 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100027021 5 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1