IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024139 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit and Individual Citations and the Cold War Certificate. 2. The applicant states the requested awards were never added to his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 * a listing of his awards, certificates, medals, ribbons, and badges from "The American War Library" CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant requested award of the Cold War Recognition Certificate. The Cold War Recognition Certificate is not governed by the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) and, as a result, it is not shown on a DD Form 214 discharge document. The Secretary of Defense approved awarding the Cold War Recognition Certificate to all members of the armed forces and qualified federal government civilian personnel who faithfully and honorably served the United States anytime during the Cold War era, which is defined as 2 September 1945 to 26 December 1991. The applicant may submit a request in writing to the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Cold War Recognition, ATTN: AHRC-CWRS, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. Therefore, this portion of the applicant's request will not be discussed any further in these Proceedings. 3. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 November 1966 and he held military occupational specialty 31E (Field Radar Repairman). He served in Vietnam with the 149th Maintenance Company from 17 August 1967 to 15 August 1968. 4. He was honorably released from active duty on 15 August 1968 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) for completion of his Reserve obligation. He was separated in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5. 5. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) 6. A review of his record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignment) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. 7. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following four campaigns: * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968) * TET Counteroffensive (30 January - 1 April 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April - 30 June 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July - 1 November 1968) 9. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. 10. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-2 (Foreign Awards and Decorations) stated the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross as a personal decoration was awarded to personnel who conducted themselves with heroic action and displayed deeds of valor while fighting the enemy. The more gallant and noteworthy the act, the higher the level of the award. This decoration was awarded in four degrees: with Palm, with Gold Star, with Silver Star, and with Bronze Star. Approval to accept and to wear a personal award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross required approval by the Commanding General of United States Army, Vietnam. As with all foreign awards, each recipient of an approved foreign award was provided a copy of the original citation from the foreign government, a translation of the citation if necessary, and a letter authorizing the recipient to receive and wear the decoration. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The evidence of record confirms he served honorably from 4 November 1966 through 15 August 1968. He completed a combat tour in Vietnam, attained the rank/grade of SP5/E-5, and received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal. 2. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, records show he participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars. 3. The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the applicant's period of assignment in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. 4. With respect to an individual/personal award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was personally cited by the Government of Vietnam or received a letter authorizing him to receive and wear this decoration. Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ____X___ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 4 November 1966 through 15 August 1968; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains award him and correcting his DD Form 214 to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross as an individual/ personal decoration. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100024139 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100024139 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1