IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100017808 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Cold War Medal (determined to mean the Cold War Recognition Certificate), Army Commendation Medal, and the Army Service Ribbon. 2. The applicant states he was awarded these medals which are not listed on his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant requested award of the Cold War Recognition Certificate. The Cold War Recognition Certificate is not governed by the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) and, as a result, is not shown on a discharge document. The Secretary of Defense approved awarding the Cold War Recognition Certificate to all members of the armed forces and qualified federal government civilian personnel who faithfully and honorably served the United States anytime during the Cold War era, which is defined as 2 September 1945 to 26 December 1991. The applicant may submit a request in writing to the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Cold War Recognition, ATTN: AHRC-CWRS, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. Based on this information, the applicant’s request for the Cold War Recognition Certificate will not be discussed any further in these Proceedings. 3. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 March 1971. He completed initial entry training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 71H (personnel specialist). The highest rank/grade he attained was specialist five (SP5)/E-5. 4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam he performed duties as a personnel records specialist while assigned to the 537th Personnel Support Company during the period 13 August 1971 to 5 April 1972. 5. He was honorably released from active duty on 9 April 1972 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation. He completed 1 year and 29 days of total active service. 6. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M16), and one Overseas Service Bar. 7. His records are void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the Army Commendation Medal by proper authority. 8. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Army Commendation Medal pertaining to the applicant. 9. His records are void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal by proper authority. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings through his service. There are no adverse actions recorded in the available records and no disqualification by his chain of command. 10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. 11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981. Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981. 12. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders. 13. Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following three campaigns: * Consolidation I (1 July - 30 November 1971) * Consolidation II (1 December 1971 - 29 March 1972) * Vietnam Ceasefire Campaign (30 March 1972 - 28 January 1973) 14. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Paragraph 6d states that Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was recommended for or awarded the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, he is not entitled to have this award added to his DD Form 214. 2. There is no evidence he served during a qualifying period of service for the Army Service Ribbon. As such, he is not entitled to have this award added to his DD Form 214. 3. He completed a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. He had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his tenure of service. There is no record of any disciplinary action taken against him or disqualification by his chain of command. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 11 March 1971 to 9 April 1972 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. 4. His records show he was authorized the Vietnam Service Medal and that he participated in three campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the bronze service stars. 5. Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units were authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the applicant's period of service. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ____X___ ____X___ ____X___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 11 March 1971 to 9 April 1972; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award), Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. 2. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Service Ribbon. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100017808 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100017808 5 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1