IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015755 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states his lieutenant was killed and the radio operator had both hands blown off in the same incident. He states he was wounded in his right wrist and thigh and the company commander pinned a Purple Heart on his ammunition bag. 3. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's military personnel records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 August 1967. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). 3. The applicant was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Light Infantry Brigade from 20 February 1968 to 4 February 1969 while in the Republic of Vietnam. 4. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not contain any entries indicating the applicant received any wounds. 5. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart. 6. On 22 August 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty due to expiration term of service. He had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days of active service that was characterized as honorable. 7. There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart and his name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Listing. 8. The applicant's service medical records were not available for review. 9. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart for the applicant. 10. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. armed services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant's statement concerning injuries he suffered in Vietnam was considered. However, there are no corroborating documents or evidence to show he was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action. 3. The applicant's military personnel records do not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action and his service medical records were not available for review. Therefore, there is no substantiating evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that the injuries required treatment, or that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. 4. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. 5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x____ ___x_____ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090015755 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090015755 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1