BOARD DATE: 16 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090006085 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. 2. The applicant states that his BCD was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 4 years and 4 months of service. 3. The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 March 1994. His highest grade held was private first class, E-3. He was assigned to Germany in October 1994. 3. On 13 July 1995, the applicant was found guilty pursuant to his pleas by a general court-martial of three specifications of wrongful distribution of marijuana (hashish form) and wrongful distribution of five dosage units of steroids. He was sentenced to a reduction to pay grade private, E-1, a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 13 months, and to be discharged from the service with a BCD. On 18 November 1995, the convening authority approved the sentence and, except for that portion extending to a BCD, ordered it to be executed. 4. On 6 March 1996, the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence. The BCD was ordered to be executed on 22 May 1997. 5. The applicant was discharged on 16 July 1997 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 3, section IV, as a result of court-martial. He completed a total of 2 years, 5 months, and 6 days of creditable active service with 316 days of lost time due to confinement. 6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-11 of this regulation states that a Soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. 7. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process, and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed. 8. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends that his BCD was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 4 years and 4 months of service. 2. It is noted that the trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. 3. The applicant’s record of service shows he was convicted by a general court-martial conviction for three specifications of wrongful distribution of marijuana (hashish form) and wrongful distribution of five dosage units of steroids. Based on the seriousness of the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted, his service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, there is no basis to grant the relief requested. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x____ ___x____ __x______ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090006085 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090006085 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1