IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 FEBRUARY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018337 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states that he received the Purple Heart in Vietnam but he never received orders and the award was not placed on his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; page three of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); and numerous service medical records in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted on 26 February 1970 for a period of 3 years. He arrived in Vietnam on 20 December 1970. He served as a crawl tractor operator assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 326th Engineer Battalion in Vietnam from 5 January 1971 until he was wounded in action on 16 April 1971 and evacuated to the United States on 13 May 1971 for further medical treatment. On 15 February 1972, the applicant was released from active duty in the rank of specialist five after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 20 days of creditable active service with no time lost. 3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) as authorized awards. 4. There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant’s service personnel records. 5. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart. 6. A Western Union telegram states the applicant was slightly wounded in Vietnam on 16 April 1971 as the result of hostile action. 7. Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 shows that he was wounded on 16 April 1971. The Vietnam Casualty Roster also shows the applicant was wounded in action on 16 April 1971. 8. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal. His records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service. 9. Records show the applicant participated in one campaign during his assignment in Vietnam. 10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the applicant's unit is eligible for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 6, dated 1974. 11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 12. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders. 13. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Item 40 on the applicant's DA Form 20, the Western Union telegram which states the applicant was slightly wounded in action on 16 April 1971 in Vietnam as a result of hostile action, and the entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. 2. The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist five with almost 2 years of creditable active service with no time lost. It appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 February 1970 through 15 February 1972 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. 3. The applicant participated in one campaign during his assignment in Vietnam which makes him eligible for award of the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star. 4. The applicant’s unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. BOARD VOTE: ____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 16 April 1971 in Vietnam; b. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 February 1970 through 15 February 1972; and c. adding the Purple Heart, the Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and one bronze service star for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal on his DD Form 214. _______ _ __XXX_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080018337 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080018337 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1