IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007663 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests Item 27 [Reentry Code (RE Code)] on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "RE-4" to a more favorable RE code. 2. The applicant states that he had a family problem and had to take care of it right away; however, the problem is now resolved. He further adds that he was a good Soldier and always wanted to serve in the military. 3. The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 30 November 2007, and a copy of his DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), dated 28 August 2007, in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and 22 weeks on 17 January 2007. He completed basic combat training and was assigned to R Company, 262nd Quartermaster Battalion, Fort Lee, Virginia, for advanced individual training (AIT) in military occupational specialty (MOS) 92F (Petroleum Supply Specialist). The highest rank/grade he attained during his military service was private (PVT)/E-1. 2. On 6 May 2007, the applicant departed his AIT unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status. He returned on 11 May 2007. 3. On 3 June 2007, he departed his AIT unit in an AWOL status again and was subsequently dropped from the Army rolls on 3 June 2007. His records show that he surrendered to military authorities and returned to military control at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, on 27 August 2007. 4. On 27 August 2007, Court-Martial charges were preferred against the applicant for one specification of being AWOL during the period on or about 3 June through 27 August 2007. 5. On 28 August 2007, the applicant was interviewed by the First Sergeant, Personnel Control Facility, Fort Sill, Oklahoma. The First Sergeant remarked that the applicant did not request to remain in the military. 6. On 29 August 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), of the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge if the request was approved, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him. Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). 7. In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a dishonorable discharge. He further acknowledged he understood that if the discharge request was approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law. 8. On 8 November 2007, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed he receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 30 November 2007. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under other than honorable conditions in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu trial by Court-Martial. This form also shows that he completed 7 months and 19 days of creditable military service and had 85 days of lost time due to AWOL. Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "4." 9. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. 10. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army Reenlistment Eligibility Codes (RE codes): a. RE–1, applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met. b. RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable. They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted. c. RE-4 applies to Soldiers separated from last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of offenses punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge. Discharges under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trail by court-martial. The applicant voluntarily requested, without coercion, discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. All requirements of law and regulation were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, the applicant’s discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service. 2. The evidence of record further confirms that the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trail by court-martial, due to AWOL. The RE code associated with this type of discharge is RE-4. Therefore, the applicant received the appropriate RE code associated with his discharge. 3. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the RE code is in error or unjust. The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING __XXX __ __XXX__ __XXX__ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ___ XXX ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080007663 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080007663 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1