IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080006844 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that he be advanced on the retired list to the rank and grade of First Sergeant, E-8. 2. The applicant states that he served as a First Sergeant from 24 May 1995 to 31 August 1997. He performed satisfactorily at the higher grade for over two years. He attended all (required) Army schools to advance his career and to be promoted to E-8. After 9 years of not being promoted, he retired. He should have been promoted to E-8, since he was a first sergeant for 2 years and 4 months. 3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); three DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), one for the First Sergeant Course, one for the Special Forces Assistant Operations and Intelligence Sergeant Course, and one for the Special Forces Medical Sergeant Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course; two diplomas, one for the First Sergeant Course and one for the Special Forces Assistant Operations and Intelligence Sergeant Course; two noncommissioned officer evaluation reports (NCOERs), one for the period ending April 1996 and one for the period ending April 1997; Meritorious Service Medal orders, dated 4 March 1997; release from active duty orders; and a letter, dated 14 February 2008, to the Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert J. Dole Regional Office, Wichita, KS. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 August 1977. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B. He was promoted to Sergeant First Class, E-7 in MOS 18D (Special Forces Medical Sergeant) with a date of rank of 20 May 1988. 2. The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was assigned duties as a First Sergeant on 23 May 1995. His NCOERs for the periods ending April 1996 and April 1997, during which his principal duty title was First Sergeant, show he received very commendable ratings (several “excellence” ratings and a potential for promotion rating of “among the best”) with very favorable comments. 3. The applicant retired on 31 August 1997, in the rank and grade of Sergeant First Class, E-7, after completing 20 years and 29 days of creditable active service. 4. Title 10, U. S. Code, chapter 369 governs retired grades. Section 3964 provides that warrant officers and enlisted members may, when their active service plus their service on the retired list totals 30 years, be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant performed duties as a First Sergeant. However, since he had never been promoted to E-8, he was only an acting First Sergeant. 2. It is acknowledged that the applicant’s records showed he performed very admirably while in the First Sergeant position. Unfortunately, he performed those duties during a time when the Army was drawing down its forces. Promotions came very slowly. While still speculative, it appears likely that if the applicant had felt able to continue on active duty for a few more years, until after 9/11, he most likely would have been promoted. 3. However, advancement on the retired list can only be considered when a Soldier served in a higher grade that would have qualified him for retirement, receipt of retired pay, or separation for physical disability. Since the applicant was never promoted to E-8, he was never qualified for retirement as an E-8. Therefore, it is not appropriate to consider him for advancement on the retired list to that grade. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____xx__ ___xx___ __xx____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. ________xxxxx__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006844 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006844 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1