SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS

	IN THE CASE OF:.

	BOARD DATE:  15 February 2001
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2001052784

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  A quorum was present during the further consideration and deliberation.  The findings appearing in proceedings dated 1 July 1999 were affirmed.  The following additional findings, conclusions, and recommendation were adopted by the Board.

	Mr. Carl W. S. Chun		Director	
	Mr. Lee Cates		Analyst	

	The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated 1 July 1999.

	Mr. Fred N. Eichorn		Chairperson	
	Mr. Melvin H. Meyer		Member	
	Ms. Margaret K. Patterson		Member	

	The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

	The Board considered the following additional evidence:

	Exhibit A – US Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC) letter, Subject: Return of ABCMR Application (Flowers, Benjamin L., 432-49-3054). 

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:

7.  On 10 August 1999, the Chief, Personnel Actions Branch, US Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center advised the Board that the applicant was discharged from the Army for Fraudulent Entry effective 6 May 1999.

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES: 

3.  At the time of the Board’s 1 July 1999 decision in this case, it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time of his enlistment.

4.  In view of the additional factors in this case the applicant is not entitled to correction of his record to show he enlisted for 6 years on 6 May 1999.  The Board notes that he has since been discharged for Fraudulent Entry.

5.  The Board now concludes the applicant’s records need not be corrected as previously directed, and that the previous recommendation should be rescinded.

6.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below, to show there is no longer a basis for the granting of his request.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by rescinding the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated 1 July 1999, and to show that the individual’s request was denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__fe__  ___mm_____  __mp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________  ________  ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________ DENY APPLICATION

                                                        ___Fred N. Eichorn____
		        CHAIRPERSON

INDEX

CASE ID	AR2001052784	
SUFFIX		
RECON	YYYYMMDD	
DATE BOARDED	20010215	
TYPE OF DISCHARGE	(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)	
DATE OF DISCHARGE	YYYYMMDD	
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY	AR . . . . .  	
DISCHARGE REASON		
BOARD DECISION	(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)	
REVIEW AUTHORITY		
ISSUES         1.100	Rescind ABCMR Proceedings of 1 Jul 99.	
2.		
3.		
4.		
5.		
6.