RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00672 XXXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE APPLICANT: XXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When her late husband retired, she was not included in any discussions or decisions involving his military affairs and was not aware that he had elected to decline SBP coverage. She now understands that she should have received a notice from the Air Force notifying her of his decision. In support of her request, the applicant provides a notarized personal statement; copies of the decedent’s death certificate; marriage license, and other supporting documents. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant and the service member were married on 29 Sep 56. The service member died on 22 Jan 13. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends granting relief. They note that the record should be corrected to show that, effective 30 Nov 76, the decedent elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full retired pay. Approval should be contingent upon recovery of SBP premiums the decedent would have paid had he made the election at that time. Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established the SBP effective 21 Sep 72, required that the spouse be informed when a married member declined or elected less than maximum spouse coverage. The U.S. Court of Claims has consistently ruled that widows of members retiring after SBP's implementation, who were not given notice of the sponsor's election, are entitled to full SBP coverage-Barber v. U.S., 676 F.2d 651 (Cl. Ct. 1982); Dean v. U.S., 10 Cl. Ct. 563 (1986); and Kelly v. U.S., 826 F.2d 1049 (Fed Cir. 1987)--commonly called Barber cases. There was no requirement for spouses to concur in the SBP elections until passage of PL 99-145 which applies only to members retiring on or after 1 Mar 86. In this case, as in all Barber cases, the facts are essentially the same: there is no record the required notice was sent to the applicant and the applicant has provided a sworn statement that she did not receive notification that the decedent had declined SBP coverage. Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records reflect the member declined SBP coverage prior to his 1 Dec 76 retirement. Neither the decedent’s election form, nor evidence that the required notice was or was not sent to the applicant could be located. In the event relief is granted, the unpaid contributions to the SBP that would have been deducted from the member's retired pay through the date of his death (approximately $132,295.00) must be collected from any annuity payment the applicant would be entitled to receive. The complete AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is attached at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jun 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has adequately addressed the issues presented by the applicant and we are in agreement with its opinion and recommendation. In addition, we remind the applicant that approval is contingent upon recovery of SBP premiums the decedent would have paid had he made the election at that time. Accordingly, we recommend the decedent’s record be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 30 November 1976, he elected spouse only coverage based on full retired pay. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00672 in Executive Session on 5 December 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. Although chaired the panel, in view of her unavailability, has signed as Acting Panel Chair. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Feb 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 3 Jun 13. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 13. Acting Panel Chair 1 2