RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00361 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to change his spouse and child coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from full to a reduced level of retired pay. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made every effort to have the SBP reduced to the minimum rate prior to his retirement. However, he was not successful since the SBP coordinator was on leave and no one else could assist him prior to his retirement. The applicant provides no documents in support of his request. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial. DPFFF states that an SBP election may not be arbitrarily terminated as long as the beneficiary remains eligible; however, Public Law 105-85 authorized retirees to terminate SBP coverage during the 25th through the 36th month after commencement of retired pay. Retirees must complete a DD Form 2656-2, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request, and obtain the spouse's notarized consent. Disenrollments are effective the month following the Defense Finance and Accounting Service - Cleveland Center's (DFAS-CL) receipt of a properly completed request, which must have been postmarked not later than the end of the 36th month following the effective date of retirement. The law does not require DFAS-CL to individually notify retirees of their option to disenroll during the one-year period and there is no refund of premiums. With regard to the applicant’s attempt to change his SBP election to a reduced level of coverage after his retirement date; item R(1) of the SBP Report of Individual Person (RIP) clearly states the DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel, must be completed and provided to the SBP Counselor prior to his retirement date. This would include any changes to his original election. The applicant's signature in Section XI, Item 30a, of the DD Form 2656 also indicates acknowledgment he received counseling that he could terminate SBP participation, with his wife's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Approval of this request would provide the applicant an opportunity not afforded other retirees. The applicant may disenroll with his wife's written concurrence, during the one-year period beginning 1 Jan 2015 as authorized by PL 105-85. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Jun 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 30 Sep 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2013-00361: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jan 2013. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 22 May 2013. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jun 2013. Panel Chair