RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01564 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 15 Oct 10 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had an undiagnosed medical condition which should have precluded him from participating in the contested FA. A Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on his right shoulder completed after the FA revealed tendonitis and a labrum tear in his right shoulder. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a Medical Provider Memorandum from a Physician’s Assistant (PA) and his Report of Individual Fitness from AFFMS. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5) during the matter under review. On 15 Oct 10, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score, completing only 16 pushups. Subsequently, he failed FAs on 17 Dec 10, 16 Mar 11, and 3 Jan 12. On 9 Mar 12, a PA annotated on a Medical Provider Form stating “Based on the those findings (tendonitis and a labrum tear in his right shoulder) and treatment, the member likely failed pushups secondary to shoulder abnormalities and would have been exempted from pushups if the evaluation was done prior to the fitness testing on 15 Oct 10.” If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she has the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FA Coordinator (FAC) or Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) holds scores of RegAF and Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Airmen who become injured or ill for five duty days to allow Medical and Commander review. Scores can be entered in AFFMS on the sixth day if the Commander does not invalidate the results. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. On 10 May 12, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation, specifically, a completed AF Form 108, Air Force Physical Fitness and Intervention Processing, indicating he had a preexisting condition that contributed to his FA failure. The applicant did not provide the requested documentation. Therefore, recommend the FA in question not be deleted from AFFMS. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. We note the medical documentation the applicant submitted reflects a back strain/injury of some type; however, we do not find it sufficient to recommend the contested FA be invalidated. In this respect we note that even if the applicant should have been exempted from the push-up portion of the contested FA, the applicant still would have received an overall rating of unsatisfactory. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01564 in Executive Session on 4 Dec 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Aug 12, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 12. Panel Chair