RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She should be entitled to award of the VSM for her stateside service in support of Operation FREQUENT WIND, 29 -30 Apr 75, while assigned to Eglin AFB FL, where the Vietnam refugees arrived. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with her 30 Sep 81 separation. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The applicant’s record will be administratively corrected to reflect her entitlement to the award of the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, with Three Oak Leaf Clusters (AFOUA, W/3OLCS). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant’s entire active duty service was within the Continental United States (CONUS). She is not credited with any foreign service nor does she claim to have served in the area of responsibility (AOR). The applicant is ineligible for entitlement to the VSM for Operation FREQUENT WIND as the basic criteria has not been met. They were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the award of the AFTR and the AFOUA, w/3OLCs. The complete AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale that relief beyond that already granted administratively is not warranted. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02125 in Executive Session on 19 January 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 10, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 20 Jul 10. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10. Panel Chair