RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00731 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his honorable discharge. In addition, his length of service be corrected to reflect his separation date as 20 February 1964. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Even though his discharge reads December of 1963, he was not able to leave his base of discharge until 20 February 1964. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 9 July 1963 to 2 December 1963. A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 18 September 2006, indicates the applicant’s records may have been destroyed in the fire at NPRC on 12 July 1973. Based on the limited available records, the applicant was discharged effective 2 December 1963 with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service in the grade of airman basic (E-1). He served 4 months and 24 days on active duty. An Air Force Personnel Center letter, dated 31 August 1977, indicates the Air Force Discharge Review Board upgraded the applicant’s discharge to honorable on 6 February 1970, under provisions of Air Force Regulation 39-16, Unsuitability. The applicant’s record contains a DD Form 256 AF, Honorable Discharge Certificate, with an effective date of 2 December 1963. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an Investigation Report (Exhibit C). On 16 June 2010, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. In addition, he was given the opportunity to submit comments about his post service activities (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. According to a National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter, dated 18 September 2006, the applicant’s military service records may have been destroyed in the 12 July 1973 fire. The applicant’s original DD Form 214 indicates a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service; however, it was damaged to the extent of not being legible. Nevertheless, available legible documents verify his characterization of discharge was upgraded to honorable by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 6 February 1970. According to the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), they issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate (contained in the record) and a DD Form 214 to reflect the AFDRB’s decision; however, a copy of the revised DD Form 214 is not contained in the record. Since the revised DD Form 214 was completed after the NPRC fire, AFPC was contacted to see if a copy was available in the historical files; however, the historical files only date back to 1989. Therefore, with the unfortunate facts that his DD Form 214 with an honorable characterization of service is not available, and his DD Form 214 with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service is not legible, it is impossible to recreate a new DD Form 214 without access to the required information. In reference to the applicant’s request to extend his length of service to 20 February 1964, the applicant has provided no evidence to support this request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to recommend granting the relief of sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00731 in Executive Session on 21 October 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00731: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Feb 10, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. FBI Report 957636N11, dated 1 Jun 10. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 Jun 10, w/atchs. Panel Chair