ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00722 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s record be changed to show he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 20 May 2009. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. In a letter, with attachments, dated 13 May 2009, the applicant requests reconsideration. She states when the prenuptial agreement is compared to the divorce decree, the decree specifically spells out her entitlement to the survivor’s benefits rights. The Air Force is partly at fault because under the retiree account statement, they have continually listed her social security number, not his surviving spouse. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous decision. Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-00722 in Executive Session on 4 June 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 28 May 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 May 2009, w/atchs. Panel Chair