ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-04056-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his service in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 20 October 2010. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request for the award of the Distinguished Flying Cross; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit D. On 21 February 2013, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. As new evidence in support of his request, he submits a personal statement, witness statements, his unit’s historical data, temporary duty orders, a photograph and citations from other unit members who received the DFC. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In an earlier finding, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant corrective action. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of the appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find the additional submitted documentation conclusively shows he is entitled to the relief he seeks. The personal sacrifice the applicant endured for our country is noted; however, insufficient evidence has been presented to warrant award of the Distinguished Flying Cross. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-04056 in Executive Session on 15 October 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit D. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 Oct 10, with Exhibits A through C. Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 28 Jan 13, w/atchs.